Splitting up families on flights a risk to air safety, report warns

Family members sat in different sections of the plane may waste precious time looking for one another during an emergency evacuation - Leonardo Patrizi
Family members sat in different sections of the plane may waste precious time looking for one another during an emergency evacuation - Leonardo Patrizi

Splitting up families on flights when they refuse to pay for allocated seating could pose a safety risk to all passengers, a report has suggested.

Low-cost airlines such as Ryanair have come under fire in recent years for assigning travellers on the same booking seats in different rows - often a long way apart - unless they fork out extra. In February the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) launched an investigation after research showed that one in five travellers who don’t pay for allocated seating are split up from their friends or family. For Ryanair, the fraction is more than one in three. Now it is claimed that the practice doesn’t just inconvenience air passengers – it is dangerous.

One in three Ryanair passengers who don't pay for allocated seating are separated from their travelling companions
One in three Ryanair passengers who don't pay for allocated seating are separated from their travelling companions

The Royal Aeronautical Society Flight Operations Group (FOG) believes family members sat in different sections of the plane may waste precious time looking for one another during an emergency evacuation, putting themselves - and others - at risk.

Its report, Emergency Evacuation of Commercial Passenger Aeroplanes, published last week, examined more than a dozen recent case studies and outlined 17 recommendations to improve the process.

Under “passenger seat allocation” it advises: “Operators should not charge for family members to sit together. This is especially important… if an emergency situation occurs, such an evacuation, decompression or air turbulence, when the assistance and supervision of an adult is likely to be of paramount importance.”

The report adds: “Group members who are separated might seek each other out in an emergency evacuation, which might have a serious impact on passenger flow to emergency exits. Children accompanied by adult(s) should ideally be seated in the same seat row as the adult. In twin-aisle aeroplanes, children and accompanying adults should not be separated by more than one aisle. When this is not possible, then children should not be seated more than one row forward or aft from accompanying adults.”

Ryanair’s policy means children under 12 must sit beside an adult on the same booking, but millions of families without young children, as well as friends and loved ones, routinely find themselves split up because they’d rather not pay extra (between £4 and £15 per person per flight) to reserve a seat.

“Like all EU airlines, we comply fully with all EU safety regulations as demonstrated by our 33-year industry leading safety record,” said a Ryanair spokesperson. “All customers can choose to purchase a reserved seat or take a free randomly allocated seat, while our family seating policy requires families (with children under 12) to sit together, with one adult taking a reserved seat for just £4, and the children given free of charge reserved seats.”

How to survive a plane crash
How to survive a plane crash

Other FOG recommendations include the locking of overhead bins to prevent passengers from trying to retrieve their belongings during an emergency evacuation. After fire engulfed a British Airways plane at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas in 2015, passengers were criticised for taking many of their possessions - including some wheelie suitcases - with them.

The report highlighted a 2012 emergency landing of a Virgin Atlantic flight at Gatwick, during which “passengers retrieving hand baggage from overhead lockers delayed the evacuation”, and the 2016 Emirates crash landing at Dubai, when “overhead bins were opened to retrieve baggage even though the evacuation had already commenced and a degree of urgency was obvious due to smoke in the cabin and the external fire”.

Should overhead bins be locked during take-off and landing? - Credit: GETTY
Should overhead bins be locked during take-off and landing? Credit: GETTY

“Passengers seemed to be more concerned with their… possessions rather than their own safety or the safety of fellow passengers,” said the report. The solution? “One mitigating option would be for overhead bins to be centrally locked for taxi, take-off and landing, although passengers would still be able to retrieve under-seat stowage items in an evacuation.”