Top image: Zachary Tang.
I’m writing this while lying in bed, still in my pyjamas (it’s 4:26 PM, if you’re wondering), and have just farted, which has earned me a disapproving stare from my dog.
You can say I’m living the life.
Because of COVID-19, the RICE editorial team, like employees in different companies across Singapore, has been instructed to work from home.
There were some initial trepidations: How would we conduct our morning meetings? Would it be difficult to communicate with each other? What would be the effect on our productivity?
After two weeks of working from home, I think I can say for the entire team that there has been no change in the way we operate. Or if there is any, it’s that we have, on the contrary, been more productive and engaged with our work. Drafts are coming in before deadline. People are volunteering to attend events to—gasp—network and maintain relations. The messages in Slack (the messaging platform we use) have changed from suicidal/murderous to peppy exclamation-mark statements!!!
That is to say, we are … happy? What is this alien feeling?
The positive results from this work-from-home experiment got me thinking: if we, as a company, have been functioning so well while working remotely, why shouldn’t we be doing this permanently? Or why shouldn’t any company, for that matter?
Remote working is, obviously, not applicable across all industries. You can’t work from home if you’re a chef or a sex worker, for example. (Though I hear from a cousin’s friend’s brother that something called the “cam scene” is booming. What is that???)
Even if your work is not tied to a specific site or oriented around a person, some considerations may stop you from working from home. For instance, people who deal with sensitive and confidential information necessarily have to work within a secure space, because we don’t want more leaks than we already had in 2019. Client-facing jobs are, well, client-facing for a reason: it’s hard to replicate, over an electronic medium, the process of feeling each other out and establishing mutual trust.
For everyone else, however, I don’t see why most of Singapore’s workforce shouldn’t be allowed to work from home—even if it’s only for one day a week.
According to a Gallup poll , “54% of office workers say they’d leave their job for one that offers flexible work time.” This sentiment is the same in Singapore. Not having flexible work arrangements is the biggest factor in employee resignation, a 2018 Ministry of Manpower report states.
It’s no great mystery why people enjoy working from home. By skipping the morning commute, you get an extra hour or two lying in bed and can wake up feeling refreshed instead of grouchy. You have the freedom to wear whatever you feel most comfortable in—tee shirt and shorts, your boyfriend’s OCS singlet and boxers—instead of constrictive and kinky business attire.
And in the words of an unnamed RICE employee:
ALSO WHO DOESN’T LIKE WORKING FROM THEIR BED?????
But if enjoyment doesn’t translate into productivity, all this would mean nothing. For the RICE team, there are very real gains in productivity. This is primarily because the team comprises a bunch of dysfunctional introverts, so the very fact that there are no other human beings around means we can focus on writing instead of trying to be sociable flesh bags.
Working from home, we are also spared the distractions that constantly crop up in the office, such as meetings that happen around us, angsty colleagues yelling expletives into the air because of writer’s block, or having an impromptu mangosteen party. (All true stories.)
In any case—pardon me for this gross C-suite phrase—happy workers are good workers! Working in a comfortable, familiar environment where you can be the slug you are is, by and large, beneficial for your mental health. And mental health is perhaps the most important determinant of work performance.
Anecdotal evidence from the RICE farmers aside, the benefits of working from home are evident across different industries and countries.
Ms Yvonne Li, the director of PR agency Tate Anzur, tells Today, “I would say that we have been more productive in this period. Since everyone is working from home and is easily reachable for discussion online, we were able to establish concrete plans with our clients quickly.”
Most Singaporeans can resist the siren song of their bed too. According to a CNA article, when working from home, people actually work outside official office hours because when you’re working from home, work and leisure blur together. (Whether that is a good thing is another issue altogether.) And the same Gallup poll found that Americans who work at home (or remotely) three or four days a week have the highest level of engagement with their work. The paper concludes:
Employees who spend some time off-site won’t suffer losses in their engagement and that there will be performance improvements that go with it … remote workers are more productive than on-site workers as well.
Yes, there are downsides to working from home. There are strange people who need human interaction through the day to keep them energised. Without some form of temperature control in Singapore’s humid, mid-day heat, it’s almost impossible to concentrate on work—the late Lee Kuan Yew himself declared that “without air conditioning you can only work in the cool early-morning hours or at dusk.” And, as aforementioned, when you don’t leave the office physically, it becomes hard to disengage from work mentally.
But it’s clear that the positives outweigh these objections; evidence shows that working from home provides tangible benefits to companies and employees both. It’s not often that a win-win situation crops up in capitalism.
Yet, in 2018, only 8.4% of companies in Singapore allow their employees to work from home. Why aren’t more companies in Singapore allowing their employees to be happier and more productive and engaged with their work?
If you have ever finished your work for the day at 5 PM but decided to stay in the office till 9 PM because you didn’t want to leave before your boss, who was still hammering away at whatever/whomever he was working on, welcome to the Singapore office. Where presenteeism, not productivity, is the buzzword of the … forever.
We have an infamously toxic work culture. Workplace politics can get more intricate and drawn out than the current anime betrayal happening with our upstairs neighbour. Managers value face-time and think that anyone who is not physically in the office and glued to their chair is out sipping a frozen margarita. In their world, there exists no concept of trust. Or humanity. They don’t believe that people can be self-motivated enough to do work without needing the Eye of Sauron perpetually trained on them. And if people are being paid for their time, they jolly well spend that time in the office and not at home!!!
Except for statistics like the number of hours worked (at 45.6 hours , Singaporeans worked the second highest number of hours a week in 2015), there exists no hard data on how toxic Singapore’s work culture is. It’s hard and counterproductive to assign a value on something as intangible as culture, anyway.
But I don’t think we need an in-depth study to tell us what all of us, having gone through such experiences ourselves, already know: unless you’re lucky, working in Singapore is a pretty shit experience. You’re more likely to get chummy with the CEO’s secretary than to be allowed to work from home.
For years, Singaporeans have been chastised about our low productivity . We are instructed to utilise technology to make companies more efficient. The government is constantly throwing money at us so we can take courses and become better workers.
But maybe we don’t need all that. We just need to be allowed to stay at home to do our work. And we’ll become more productive and happier people.
It’s sad that it’s taken an epidemic for most Singapore companies to allow their workers the opportunity to work from home. When COVID-19 gets scorched to death in the summer months, companies will, hopefully, remember the lessons learnt from COVID-19: emergency preparedness, hygiene measures, financial resilience, blah blah blah. All that, certainly. But also that working from home is not giving employees a vacation. It’s trusting in people to do their work, to manage their time, and to let them live their lives.
Being “future-ready” is another of those meaningless jargon Singapore statutory boards and schools like to throw around. Unless Singapore companies accept that telecommuting—i.e. working from home, the coffee house, on top of your toilet bowl—is the future, the only thing we are getting ready for is obsolescence.
Are you reading this article at home or in your office? Tell us at firstname.lastname@example.org. We promise we won’t tell your boss if you’re doing this during office hours.
The post 2 Weeks of WFH Convinced Me That This Is The Future Of Work in Singapore appeared first on RICE.